- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:08:38 +0100
- To: Andrew McMillan <andrew@morphoss.com>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Andrew McMillan wrote: > ... >> Can't resist: "I told you so". Pseudo-properties are bad; they require >> more special cases, create ambiguities and confusion. > > Conceptually, the idea of the actual data just being one element of the > meta-data doesn't seem unreasonable. > ... Yes, that is true. But in that case, it should behave the same everywhere, be it PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, REPORT or SEARCH. > I have to confess that in my implementations to date I had just assumed > that the data is only one property within the schema, and it's certainly > much simpler for me to code it that way in my own application. Indeed. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 21 November 2009 08:09:34 UTC