Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > I support this draft, and believe the element names should be added into > the DAV: namespace. Yes, I hear that a lot. It would be good to hear the Apps Area Director's opinion, though... > I suggest removing the section that talks about the HTTP Link header, to > remove this dependency (or at least, marking it somehow as "to be > removed by editor if the HTTP Link I-D is not ready"). I've rearranged it so it's clear it's optional (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-post-latest.html>). Funny enough, in the meantime the Link header was updated as well, so maybe we can just leave things in. BR, JulianReceived on Monday, 1 December 2008 16:50:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT