W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2008

Mapping DAV link properties to HTML/Atom/Http link relations

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:14:51 +0100
Message-ID: <491833CB.7010804@gmx.de>
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Hi,

some while ago, the Atom feed format has introduced link relations that 
either can use a short name (through an IANA registry), or a full URI as 
identifier. 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02> 
generalizes this concept, introducing a single registry for both (X)HTML 
and Atom link relations, and also re-introduces the HTTP Link header 
(defined in RFC 2068, but dropped from RFC 2616).

In WebDAV, we already have properties of type link implicitly (by 
containing DAV:href elements). So, for instance, the DAV:checked-in 
property defined in 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3253.html#rfc.section.3.2.1>, could 
be interpreted to also define a link relation identified by the URI 
"DAV:checked-in".

Potential benefits:

1) Use in HTTP Link Header

A server could expose the property value in an HTTP response header, 
independently of WebDAV:

HEAD /foobar HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plain
Link: </versions/foobar/1>; rel="DAV:checked-in"


2) Response bodies of WebDAV requests that affect the set of links could 
be made more useful, such as in:

VERSION-CONTROL /foobar HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com

HTTP/1.1 201 OK
Content-Type: application/xml+xhtml
Content-Length: xxx

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
   <head>
     <title>Resource put under Version Control</title>
   </head>
   <body>
     <p>
       The resource has been put under version control; the
       version history is located at <a rel="DAV:version-history" 
href="/histories/123">/histories/123</a>, and the initial version is <a 
rel=DAV:checked-in" href="/versions/456">/versions/456</a>.
     </p>
   </body>
</html>

Open issue: WebDAV uses QNames to identify properties, and they do not 
always map well to absolute URIs -- the simplest approach to address 
this is by choosing namespace URIs wisely...

Feedback appreciated,

Julian
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 13:15:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT