Re: Relationship between BIND and RFC 3253

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> I change my response to agree with Werner.
> RFC 3253 explicitly requires that the versioning metadata have a MOVE 
> "move" semantics, not "copy/delete" semantics (section 3.15), so the 
> "Hm" note does not apply.
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff

I agree as well.

So, should I spend some energy into integrating the proposal in 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2008JulSep/0039.html> 
into the current version of the draft?

BR, Julian