Jack Cleaver wrote: > ... > I found both Tomcat's and Jetty's HTTP stack to be unsuitable as a basis > for building a DAV stack. Certainly it *should* be as you suggest; but > these programs weren't designed with this kind of extension in mind. > Really, it is much easier to throw it all away and start again. > > Jetty is much better than Tomcat in this respect; but even Jetty has > some limitations. This isn't really criticism; designing software to be > extensible without having much of a clue what extensions people are > going to try and build is very difficult. > ... Out of curiosity: what kinds of problems did you experience? As far as I can tell, the most compliant and complete WebDAV servers are currently implemented as servlets... BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:34:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT