Helge Hess wrote: > Could you elaborate? An MGET capable cache could still disassemble the > MGET and serve the individual resources from its cache (which is in fact > why I would prefer a real MGET instead of a REPORT). It would really > just be a nested request. OK, that would work, but will be tricky to deploy. *Existing* caches will not know how to do it. > ... BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 10:07:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT