On Friday 23 May 2008 09:36:46 Henrik Holst wrote: > There is no MUST in RFC4918 for the MKCOL Method so class 1 does not > include MKCOL as far as I can see. Is it intentional? I mean, RFC2518 says "All DAV compliant resources MUST support the MKCOL method." And advertising class 3 would not imply support for MKCOL, if I read the definition of class 3 correctly.Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 13:50:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:16 GMT