Re: Thoughts on relation to WebDAV

Petr Tomasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:55:44AM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> here are a few thoughts about how to handle the WebDAV dependencies of 
>> CardDAV (mostly based on what was discussed in the VCARDDAV WG meeting 
>> in Philadelphia):
>>
>> 1) WebDAV base requirements
>>
>> I think CardDAV should require WebDAV level 3 support, as defined by RFC 
>> 4918. It seems there was some confusion about what level 3 actually is: 
> 
> I think this is a big error, requiring all that stuff. Consider if one
> would want to implement read-only CardDAV implementation.
> Why should one worry about locking, MKCOL and the other stuff?

In that case you would simply return 403 Forbidden.

Anyway, what does this have to do with the question whether CardDAV 
should require level 1 or level 3?

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 09:41:28 UTC