Am 16.07.2007 um 16:57 schrieb Julian Reschke: >> However, I do agree that this is not an ideal state of affairs. If >> there is consensus in the WebDAV community to do so, I agree that >> we should write up a formal extension to MKCOL that would cover >> all the other MKxxx's behaviors. However, I do not believe that >> belongs in CardDAV, it should be a separate extension that CardDAV >> can itself leverage. I would be happy to put a spec together on >> that (extracting the behaviors from the existing specs). > > I think that would be great. I think all we need is a request body > (XML + mime type) that will allow to specify a set of WebDAV > properties, including the resource type. Maybe send a POST + request body to the parent collection? POST seems to have been avoided by WebDAV to not interfere with webapps using the same URIs. But those days are over. //StefanReceived on Monday, 16 July 2007 15:52:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:27 GMT