Re: overwrite and depth-0 locks

Geoffrey M Clemm schrieb:
> 
> All use cases below other than #1 require the locktoken.
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Correct.

In all cases except #1, the state of the collection is changed, by 
replacing a binding (aka "path segment mapping" in RFC2518bis).

Tim: speaking of which, was there anything in 
draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18.html>) 
or draft-ietf-webdav-bind-18 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-18.html>) 
suggesting something else?

Best regards, Julian