Julian Reschke schrieb: >>> updates the registrations (and in a sense formalizes them since RFC 2518 >>> did not have an IANA Considerations section explicitly). s21.1 should >>> refer to RFC 4395 which controls the URI Scheme registry. s21.3 should >>> refer to RFC 4229 which formalized the initial state of the message >>> header field registrations. It occurs to me that I did not check if >>> there are any message headers which were in RFC 2518 but are now dropped >>> - if so this should probably be recorded here. >> >> Adding the two references is simple (opened: >> <http://ietf.osafoundation.org:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264>). Turns out that we also need to update the HTTP status code registry (see <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2817#section-7.1> and <http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes>). Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:24:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:15 GMT