Yes, and I think that's OK for non-WebDAV clients. A client has to get its search results in some machine-readable form. (If the client were looking for human readable results there'd likely be a WebUI and no standards involved). So XML is adequate for that purpose, and why not "DAV:" and "multistatus". At least it's a schema we have some experience with. Lisa On Apr 27, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> I think that's a very important feature. There's no intrinsic >> need for SEARCH to rely on properties, and it should be valuable >> for a number of non-WebDAV use cases. > > True, but note that the DAV:multistatus format is mandated anyway > (and I think MS Exchange is doing that for it's "sql" grammar). > >> ... > > Best regards, JulianReceived on Saturday, 28 April 2007 22:11:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:27 GMT