W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: PATCH MIME types, was: PATCH delta: dsfantf1

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:58:39 +0200
Message-ID: <44F0B5FF.1000506@gmx.de>
To: edgar@edgarschwarz.de
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

edgar@edgarschwarz.de schrieb:
> I disagree. For PATCH to be of any value at least one mandatory
> delta format should be given. A binary format is enough.
> ...
> Do you really want to make a separate document for that ? Without at least
> one general mandatory delta format PATCH doesn't make sense. So please keep
> it together.
> ...

The question which formats are mandatory, and where they are defined is 
orthogonal. The patch format definitions could be in separate documents, 
  but support for them in PATCH still could be mandatory (whatever that 
means in practice...).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 26 August 2006 20:58:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:15 GMT