Hi Michael, > right, this might makes sense for formats. But I would argue with > another usecase, namely Custom Authentication > instead of HTTP authentication (BASIC or DIGEST). > > Let's assume a resource is protected and a server would like to offer > custom authentication, e.g. it would send > a HTML to a regular browser and some WebDAV specific XML to a WebDAV > enabled client, whereas I haven't digged into > WebDAV far enough how something like this could be handled by the > WebDAV spec. as Julian pointed out, this form of authentication is not covered by any specification, so there is no reliable way for a generic client to handle it anyway (besides the fact that authentication has nothing to do with WebDAV). Regards, ManfredReceived on Monday, 3 July 2006 09:03:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:26 GMT