Re: rfc2518bis-14: the term 'DAV-compliance'

Well, even if one did that, what is the point of telling the client that 
the server actually supports a method, only the send FORBIDDEN in every 
case?

Regards,
Manfred

Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote:
>
>   Well, a resource can return a FORBIDDEN response to (just about?) 
> any method and still comply, so implementing a method that you don't 
> want people to invoke is pretty trivial, no?
>
>     -wsv
>
>
> On Mar 15, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Manfred Baedke wrote:
>
>> A DAV-compliant resource has to support all methods defined in the 
>> spec with the exception of LOCK and UNLOCK.
>
>