- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:09:02 +0100
- To: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
- CC: John Barone <jbarone@xythos.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Manfred Baedke wrote: > John, > > after reading these sections again, I have to admit that RFC2518 > apparently intended to say that dead properties MUST be preserved by > COPY/MOVE unless specified otherwise by the propertybehavior element. > Therefore, I will have to change my mind from objecting against a > semantical change to proposing a semantical change :) > My point is that the MUST requirement simply does not match the SHOULD > requirement of PROPPATCH. It would be plainly impossible to COPY a > resource with dead properties to a server that does not support dead > properties (for example, a simple file system based implementation). I > am proposing to relax the requirement to SHOULD level. > > Regards, > Manfred OK, I opened an issue for this one on BugZilla (<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235>). Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 14:10:25 UTC