W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

Comments on the "new" 2518 -- Compliance Level

From: Kevin Wiggen <kwiggen@xythos.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:48:04 -0800
Message-ID: <03E7D3E231BB7B4A915A6581D4296CC602062E01@NSNOVPS00411.nacio.xythos.com>
To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Since the actions of Move, Copy, Delete are not backwardly compatible, I
don't agree with the Compliance Classes that are listed in the document.
A client will probably want to know if it's talking to an OLDER server
or a NEWER server before it takes action.  Thus there needs to be a way
for a client to tell.  Also can a server implement both (again for
backward compatibility) and thus let the client tell the server what
type of MOVE it would like (adding a DAV: 1 header or something). Maybe
DAV:1 = old RFC2518, DAV:2 = either RFC2518 w/ locks, and DAV:3 = new
RFC2518.  I am not sure how a server can be 1 & 3 with the changes to
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 01:48:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:35 UTC