W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Possible problem in collection definition

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:07:41 -0800
Message-Id: <1D20C192-83C3-49D9-B710-E6DBCE577217@osafoundation.org>
Cc: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@apple.com>, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Feb 21, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote:
>>   Should we recommend that a PROPFIND always return the same  
>> (canonical) segment from a given list of equivalent segments?
> If a server doesn't do that, UIs will behave in a *very* surprising  
> when a collection view is refreshed.
> Thus, I'd say, yes they SHOULD.

MUST, even.

Are such segment mappings considered harmful enough to recommend that  
servers SHOULD NOT have equivalence sets of segments?  (But that if  
they do, here's how they MUST do it, of course)

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 21:17:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:35 UTC