W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 229] GULP / Lock timeout discussion

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:25:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200602141025.k1EAP2Ef020197@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229

julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|-12                         |-13



------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2006-02-14 02:25 -------
In 2006-02-13 draft:

OLD:
   Clients MAY include Timeout request headers in their Section 9.10
   requests.  However, the server is not required to honor or even
   consider these requests.  Clients MUST NOT submit a Timeout request
   header with any method other than a LOCK method.

NEW:
   Clients MAY include Timeout request headers in their LOCK
   requests.  However, the server is not required to honor or even
   consider these requests.  Clients MUST NOT submit a Timeout request
   header with any method other than a LOCK method.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 10:25:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:13 GMT