W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 229] GULP / Lock timeout discussion

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:08:51 -0800
Message-Id: <200602110908.k1B98pvr009636@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229





------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2006-02-11 01:08 -------
Well, we discussed this very issue yesterday, and Jim explained that the RFC2518
language was there on purpose (allowing servers wide freedom in how they cleanup
locks).

-1 on any change with this at this point of time, in particular as I don't see
any interop problems.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 09:08:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:13 GMT