W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006


From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:35:04 -0800
Message-Id: <200602031835.k13IZ4Bu006398@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


elias@cse.ucsc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         AssignedTo|elias@cse.ucsc.edu          |fluffy@cisco.com

------- Additional Comments From elias@cse.ucsc.edu  2006-02-03 10:35 -------
Discussed during 3 Feb telecon, with consensus that the example PUT request
julian provided is correct and that ELRs are not just 'essentially' the same as
an empty resource that is locked, but is in fact identical. Julians stated
preference is to simply state this fact and refer to the locking model, leaving
the reader to derive any expected behavior from this single point of reference.
Lisa feels strongly that the additional explanatory text is useful. Elias
proposed something of a middle ground, leaving the discriptive text but remove
the normative (upper case) requirements, which Julian has said he could live with.

We respectfully request that Cullen cast a decision on the issue...

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 18:35:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:35 UTC