W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 217] GULP integration

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:04:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200602031504.k13F423U005985@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217





------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2006-02-03 07:03 -------
Looking at <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217#c1>, we
also agreed upon making the model description normative, and to adapt the
remainde r of the spec. It seems to me this still needs to be done.

Editorial: how about giving the individual parts of the model names such as 

   (L1)  A lock either directly or indirectly locks a resource.

   (L2)  A resource becomes directly locked when a LOCK request to the URL
         of that resource creates a new lock.  The "lock-root" of the new
         lock is that resource.  If at the time of the request, the URL is
         not mapped to a resource, a new empty resource is created and
         directly locked.

...and so on. This will make it easier to refer to these statements in the other
sections.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 15:04:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:13 GMT