W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: [Bug 227] Collection state definition in conflict between BIND and RFC2518bis

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:27:21 +0100
Message-ID: <43DFC829.2080206@greenbytes.de>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
> http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com  2006-01-31 12:25 -------
> I vote for option 2, since the phrase "the state of the collection includes the 
> last path segments of its internal member URLs and the resources they map to" 
> is hard to understand, whereas if you give it a term ("binding"), you can just 
> say "the state of the collection includes its bindings".

Oh well. I meant to write: "...the state of the collection includes the 
relations between the last path segments of its internal member URLs and 
the resources they map to..."

Not that this is more readable, but at least it may be correct :-)

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:29:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:13 GMT