http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ------- Additional Comments From geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com 2006-01-29 06:34 ------- > OK, I firmly believe that the right thing to do for RFC2518bis is NOT to > introduce any new requirements for ETag behaviour upon PUT, and let another > document define this. I agree. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 14:34:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:26 GMT