W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 13] new ETag requirements

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:13:01 -0800
Message-Id: <200601151413.k0FED1x9002751@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
            Version|-09                         |-10

------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2006-01-15 06:13 -------
I have followed up on last year's thread on the HTTP WG mailing list, see

That being said, in case we don't get a consensus over there, I think normative
language about PUT vs ETags needs to be removed from RFC2518bis. I've done that
in my version of the draft (see

I'd like to delay a discussion about PROPPATCH vs ETags until the PUT question
is clarified (in which case I think consequences for PROPPATCH will be obvious).

Finally, I'd like to point out that draft 10 of RFC2518bis and draft 09 of
have conflicting normative requirements, which really should tell us something.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Sunday, 15 January 2006 14:13:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:35 UTC