W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-15.txt

From: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:34:39 +0200
Message-ID: <4486D5EF.6090401@greenbytes.de>
To: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I think that the MUST requirement follows from Section 6.1:

  8.  If a request causes the lock-root of any lock to become an 
unmapped URL, then the lock MUST also be deleted by that request.

So, in the presence of Section 6.1, Section 6.9 contains nothing 
normative, as far as I can see.
I think it should at least be moved to a less prominent place, maybe as 
an introduction to an adequate example.

P.S: Maybe this is the right time to promote my proposed text for 
Sections 6 and 7 again :) :

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2006JanMar/0814.html

Jason Crawford wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 06/07/2006 at 11:28 ZE2, Manfred Baedke 
> <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> > Julian,
> >
> > I really think that the text can be dropped completely. I do not see any
> > implications that do not already follow from previous sections.
>
> I wouldn't want to drop it completely.
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:35:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:14 GMT