I would rather keep the text myself but I was trying to follow WG consensus. Do you have suggested changes to the text? Lisa On May 23, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault schrieb: >> See March 15, mail from John Barone and Manfred Baedke. > > Well, the text itself may need work, but dropping it altogether may > not be wise. It's essential that we say *somewhere* that a LOCK to > a resource a, identified by URL A1, also affects accesses through > URL A2 (with A1 != A2). > > Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 24 May 2006 14:47:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:26 GMT