W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Atomic MOVE vs BIND spec, was: Comments on the "new" 2518

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:39:54 -0700
Message-Id: <51C18AC1-D963-45EE-BD29-27C2FE1BC033@osafoundation.org>
Cc: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On May 12, 2006, at 6:27 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> I didn't think about the aspect of collections being present in  
> both source and destination namespace before, and we may want to  
> say something about that. Lisa, is this what you though of when  
> adding that text?

Yes, we didn't say anything about that before, and it only came to me  
when drafting possible text.  The idea of corrupted files also scared  
me.  Of course, we could remain silent about that, as RFC2518 was  
silent on it.

Another draft of suggested text would be welcome.

Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 19:40:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:35 UTC