Re: extend production

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> Thanks to both you and Jim; that's what I needed.
> 
> BTW, if 2518 is undergoing revision, the HTTP header registrations  
> should be updated (or made; I think I see a new one in there?); see  
> RFC3864/BCP90.

As a matter of fact, this also applies to BIND and REDIRECT. Cullen, 
should I do that for BIND right away (I don't think we'll need another 
WGLC for that...).

Best regards, Julian