On Mar 17, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> My vote is for the quota protocol, since we have at least two very >> interested implementors who want to see this completed. > > That sounds good to me, also because the quota protocol is quite > simple. Again, we need a couple reviews to finish this one off. > Jim Luther, are you still out there? With your early involvement > in quota, it would be great to have a review now, even if there are > no design issues. (At this point, finding nits is also needed). > Anybody else? Yes, I'm still lurking. I'll give the latest quota draft and Julian's issues at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/ 2005JanMar/0194.html> another look. - JimReceived on Friday, 18 March 2005 01:12:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:22 GMT