W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: WebDav methods and idempotency

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:07:56 +0100
Message-ID: <42202E5C.50203@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> On Feb 25, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> You are right, MKCOL isn't idempotent, nor is MOVE. I'll raise issues 
>> against RFC2518bis, RFC3253bis, RFC3648bis and RFC3744bis so this 
>> get's fixed in future revisions.
> 
> 
> Do you mean that MKCOL *is* idempotent, and MOVE isn't?

Yep, sorry. MKCOL is idempotent.

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 08:08:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT