Scott Lawrence wrote: > That statement misses the point - it may be true that it's difficult to > express the access control based just on the method, but that doesn't > mean that it's difficult to implement appropriate access control in > either the client or the server. The method alone does not specify the > operation - indeed, in the case of POST the full specification of the > operation is deliberately expanded to include the body mime type and the > body content. > > I don't think you've shown how what you're trying to do is any different > from what POST has always done. It's a aubset with well-defined semantics. I consider this a feature. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:39:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:22 GMT