W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: BIND and access control lists

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:08:41 -0800
Message-Id: <8feaf014125a657b53d94c713c8c95da@osafoundation.org>
Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

Let's say the user creates resource 'myresume.doc' and puts it into a 
collection 'http://example.org/~lisa/public/'.  Further, let's say that 
the public nature of this collection involves inherited permissions 
which make the new document publicly readable.

In step 2, the user does a BIND to also bind  'myresume.doc' into 
'http://example.org/~lisa/career/'.  This new location is a private 
folder, but let's assume that 'myresume.doc' remains publicly readable 
because of its membership in the public folder.  (This is where the 
BIND language would come in but this behavior seems consistent with 
that.)

In step 3, when the user does UNBIND and removes the binding into the 
public collection, does the document remain public?  That's the 
question for which I'm looking for additional specification 
requirements.

Lisa

On Feb 3, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>> This is fine with me for BIND, and I think the same is also true of 
>> REBIND and UNBIND.
>
> How is UNBIND relevant here?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 4 February 2005 00:09:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT