W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Fwd: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks.

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:58:32 +0100
Message-ID: <41F9FEB8.9070507@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> 
> 
> By the way, I agree with this wording. I would be even happier if it 
> also required the server to allow LOCK on any binding to refresh the 
> lock already existing. Can we add that?

In theory, we *can* state everything that is correct. In practice, the 
set of additional statements we can make is infinite, so it would be 
nice if you could describe why anyone would come to the impression that 
LOCK refresh is in any way different than other methods.

> ...

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 08:59:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT