- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:44:51 +0100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- CC: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, "WebDAV WG)" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > ... > There are two sections to consider in the bindings draft: > > 2.6 PROPFIND and Bindings > > Consistent with [RFC2518] the value of a dead property MUST be, and > the value of a live property SHOULD be, independent of the number of > bindings to its host resource or of the path submitted to PROPFIND. > > which I consider to be in error because live properties are owned > by the server -- any requirement that they be consistent across > bindings is wrong. > ... OK, re-opening issue "2.6_bindings_vs_properties": <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.2.6_bindings_vs_properties>. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 21:45:37 UTC