W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

[Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks.

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:40:08 -0800
Message-Id: <200501131940.j0DJe8eV020081@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2

lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |



------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-01-13 11:40 -------
We've addressed some of Jim's related concerns, but not yet addressed the
original specific questions in this bug:
 - when a resource with bindings A, B is locked via a LOCK request to A, what
MUST the contents of the lockdiscovery property look like for both A and B? (to
be clear, can A either B appear in the lockdiscovery property, or MUST A appear,
or MUST B appear?)
 - when a resource with bindings A, B is locked via a LOCK request to A, how
MUST the server respond to an UNLOCK request to B?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:40:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT