Hi, this draft resolves a few editorial issues [1], and also allows (URI) fragments in reference targets (as discussed in the RFC2616 errata for the "Location" header, see [2]). As discussed earlier, I have also completed our own implementation in SAP Netweaver's Knowledge Management (both client and server). Thus, as far as I can tell, this draft is ready for a WG last call -- it has already passed a LC in 2000, and all issues raised during and since that LC ([3]) have been resolved. Lisa, Joe, please follow-up. Best regards, Julian [1] <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-12.html#rfc.section.A.10> [2] <http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html#location-fragments> [3] <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol-issues.html>Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 20:50:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:08 GMT