W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: [Bug 2] Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks.

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:30:19 -0800
Message-Id: <E88AEF42-5906-11D9-981D-000A95B2BB72@osafoundation.org>
To: "WebDAV WG))'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>


I don't consider that this issue is resolved or fixed.  Here's what I  
asked for in the bug text:

" - when a resource with bindings A, B is locked via a LOCK request to  
A, what
MUST the contents of the lockdiscovery property look like for both A  
and B?
  - when a resource with bindings A, B is locked via a LOCK request to  
A, how
MUST the server respond to an UNLOCK request to B?"

I would like to have requirements on the server behavior in these  
cases, because otherwise it will be very likely for server implementors  
to do slightly different things.

Lisa

On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:44 AM, bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:

>
> http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
>
> julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> -----
>              Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |FIXED
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 December 2004 19:30:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC