W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:06:52 -0800
Message-ID: <41CC4CAC.7060503@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>


Julian Reschke wrote:

> I'm convinced that re-using RFC3253 terminology in an inconsistent way 
> is a Very Bad Idea [...]

Reusing /any/ terminology in an inconsistent way is a bad idea -- it 
leads to confusion among implementors, makes the ensuing discussions 
overly cumbersome, etc.


Elias

Received on Friday, 24 December 2004 17:06:56 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lisa Dusseault: "Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt"
Next in thread: Lisa Dusseault: "Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt"
Reply: Lisa Dusseault: "Re: Condition names, was: comments on draft-ietf-webdav-quota-04.txt"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT