http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 ------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de 2004-12-10 10:16 ------- Seems that we have settled the first of Jim's issues (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004OctDec/0271.html>). What about the second one? I'm not sure here what the issue is... Adding a new binding to a (previously non-locked) collection binding below a depth:infinity locked resource will cause the collection and all it's members to become part of the lock as well. Do you feel we should include an example for this? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 18:16:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT