W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: [Bug 70] New: REBIND arguments are like BIND

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cs.ucsc.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:03:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200412100003.iBA03Aov016857@cats-mx4.ucsc.edu>
To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Geoff Clemm writes:

> The REBIND method was intended to have syntax that paralleled 
> BIND.  This means that the request-URL is the collection into 
> which the binding is being created, the segment in the body 
> is the new binding name in the request-URL collection, and 
> the href in the body is the "source", i.e. the resource that 
> is being rebound. 
> The recent edits in this section (intended to address Jim's 
> observation that the meaning of arguments of the method were 
> not underspecified) were incorrect and broke this.  In 
> particular, the introductory sentences of REBIND should be 
> modeled after BIND, and the precondition names (which were 
> originally correct) should be restored.

Do we care that the parameters are now switched as compared to those of

           Source            Destination

MOVE     Request-URI         Destination header

REBIND   href XML elem     Request-URI plus segment 
                             XML elem 

I think it doesn't matter, but thought I should raise it.

- Jim
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 00:03:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:31 UTC