W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Locks and loopback bindings

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:55:39 +0100
Message-ID: <41B8ADBB.2070504@gmx.de>
To: ejw@cs.ucsc.edu
CC: "'WebDAV (WebDAV WG)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Jim Whitehead wrote:
> ...
> These are good points.
> 
> That, plus the fact that I'm getting nowhere in convincing anyone else to
> change the semantics of loopback bindings, leads me to concede this point.
> 
> It's now fine with me not to include any additional language in the BIND
> specification about locks and lookback bindings.

OK, for purposes of tracking, I've added both issue and resolution to 
the document, see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.2.1.1_bind_loops_vs_locks>.

As far I can tell, the only other open discussion we have is about the 
behaviour of properties for multiple bindings on one resource. It seems 
that we're still far from consensus, so I'd like to submit this draft 
(undoing the broken REBIND description) ASAP.

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 19:56:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC