- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:25:04 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 ------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2004-12-03 12:25 ------- How about simply text that begins with "If the server supports RFC3744 as well as this specification, then the server MUST meet the following requirements"? This is a normative reference to RFC3744, but since that's an RFC, I don't really see why we would object to a normative reference -- it won't delay bindings, and it doesn't need to be read by implementors unless they want to support it in which case they do have to read it :) The references to RFC3744 can be isolated in a section called "Compatibility with RFC3744", too, so it's not littering the rest of the spec. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 20:25:05 UTC