W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: BIND issue 3.2_example, was: Comments on bind-08

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:29:48 +0100
Message-ID: <41B023FC.70607@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: ejw@cs.ucsc.edu, "'WebDAV (WebDAV WG)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Seems to me the href should hold a fully qualified URL, since other 
>> hrefs in
>> the specification do this as well.
> It may hold whatever RFC2518 defines for DAV:href (we probably should 
> let the DTD fragment refer to RFC2518, section 12.3, right?). RFC2518 
> relies on RFC2068, section 3.2.1, which allows both absoluteURI and 
> relativeURI.
 > ...

Do we need to clarify the source of DAV:href's definition somewhere in 
BIND? Alternatives seem to be:

- explicitly mention it in the Terminology section,

- add a comment to each DTD fragment using it.

I personally feel that we don't need (for instance, RFC3744 doesn't seem 
to do it either), so unless somebody speaks up, I'll consider this one 


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 08:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:31 UTC