W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Comment on UNBIND language in BIND specification

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:08:55 +0100
Message-ID: <41950A47.2020400@gmx.de>
To: ejw@cs.ucsc.edu
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Jim Whitehead wrote:
> Julian,
> 
> 
>>I expanded the replacement further to:
>>
>>    The REBIND method removes a binding to a resource from the collection
>>    identified by the Request-URI, and adds a binding to that resource
>>    into another collection.  The request body specifies the segment to
>>    be removed and the new binding to be created (href element).  It is
>>    effectively an atomic form of a MOVE request.
> 
> 
> I like this language, though I suggest the following tweak for the second
> sentence to fix the fact that we're not removing a segment, we're removing a
> binding:
> 
> The request body specifies the binding to be removed (segment) and the new
> binding to be created (href).

Good catch. I'll make that change.

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 19:09:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC