W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Request for feedback: WebDAV property datatype draft

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:41:15 +0200 (MEST)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0409231636320.16383@gnenaghyn.vaevn.se>
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
>
>> E.g.  would this be valid?
>>   <supportedliveproperties xsi:type="soap-enc:Array">
>>     <supportedliveproperty><getetag/></supportedliveproperty>
>>     <supportedliveproperty><resourcetype/></supportedliveproperty>
>>     ...
>>   </supportedliveproperties>
>
> As far as I can tell, it would be legal according to 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383522>.
>
>> Are arrays assumed to be ordered or unordered?  Would it be legal for a 
>> server to reorder array values when returning them?
>
> "The representation of the value of an array is an ordered sequence of 
> elements constituting the items of the array."

Btw, you should see what has been done in SOAP Version 1.2
(see http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part2-20030624/#soapenc ), which 
is a REC and not a Note.
Thanks,

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2004 14:42:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT