Brian Korver wrote: >> RFC3530, section 5.10: >> >> Note that there may be a number of distinct but overlapping >> sets of files or directories for which a quota_used value is >> maintained (e.g., "all files with a given owner", "all files >> with a given group owner", etc.). >> >> The server is at liberty to choose any of those sets but should >> do so in a repeatable way. The rule may be configured per- >> filesystem or may be "choose the set with the smallest quota". >> >> So no, this doesn't apply to disk limits - disk limits are *not* quotas. > > The text says otherwise: The server can choose whatever set of > resources it wants to compute quota. It puts no restrictions > on that. Period. Brian, this is a paragraph from a section that talks about quota and nothing else, so of course it talks only about quota. > That all sounds good, but you ascribe properties to NFS that it > doesn't have (ex: compatible with [all] existing quota systems). Ok. Which one is it incompatible with? > ... Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2004 22:08:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:21 GMT