W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Call for consensus on UNLOCK Request-URI being lock root

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:36:16 -0700
Message-ID: <40EB0D40.4060903@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

> [...] the issue being discussed is just whether or not the refresh of 
> the lock has to be applied to the URL of the root of the lock, or 
> whether it can be applied to the URL of an indirectly locked resource 
> and then be automatically redirected by the server to the URL of the 
> root of the lock. 

Ah, thanks, I had indeed misunderstood the specific issue (while 
frantically trying to catch up on my email). So, in that case, I think I 
would still prefer option 1, given the evidence of current 
implementation behaviour. I'll try to read more carefully in the 
future...  ;-)

Cheers,
Elias
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2004 16:36:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT