W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: locking clarifications/extensions vs BIND draft vs RFC2518bis

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:52:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4008F7CD.3000701@gmx.de>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

In an off-list mail, Jim Whitehead wrote:

 > I'm tempted to just put BIND right into 2518bis -- worst case
 > we recycle at
 > Proposed, which I don't see as being a major adoption
 > impediment anymore (we
 > could perhaps call it WebDAV v2, to make it clear that we're making
 > progress).

Well, I think that would be a radical change to our strategy...

Seems that opinions vary between

1) take locking out, keep BIND out, make everyhing more modular and
2) keep locking in, add BIND, publish RFC2518+BIND (staying at the 
"proposed level")

I'd definifively vote for 1).

Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2004 03:52:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC