W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Call for consensus on UNLOCK Request-URI being lock root

From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:21:50 -0400
To: Lisa Dusseault <nnlisa___at___osafoundation.org@smallcue.com>
Cc: WebDAV <nnw3c-dist-auth___at___w3.org@smallcue.com>
Message-ID: <OFB9133436.FB3AC720-ON85256EC0.0016440D-85256EC0.0017F545@us.ibm.com>
On Monday, 06/21/2004 at 10:37 MST, Lisa Dusseault  wrote:
> This would overturn a consensus that had previously been determined at
> a WG meeting that happened together with an interoperability meeting,
> and the consensus was not challenged on the mailing list at that time.
> 
> However, given that we have new information -- actual research!
> (thanks) -- it does make sense to reconsider.
> 
> WG members please indicate your old, new, and/ or current preference,
> with reasons if they've not already been stated here:
> 1. Should servers accept an UNLOCK request where the Request-URI names
> any resource covered by the lock named in the lock token?
> 2. Or, should servers redirect that UNLOCK request to the root of the
> lock?
> 3. If something else, please explain.
 

No strong preference so just go with what existing servers do. 

J.
Received on Sunday, 27 June 2004 00:22:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT