Re: Call for consensus on UNLOCK Request-URI being lock root

On Monday, 06/21/2004 at 10:37 MST, Lisa Dusseault  wrote:
> This would overturn a consensus that had previously been determined at
> a WG meeting that happened together with an interoperability meeting,
> and the consensus was not challenged on the mailing list at that time.
> 
> However, given that we have new information -- actual research!
> (thanks) -- it does make sense to reconsider.
> 
> WG members please indicate your old, new, and/ or current preference,
> with reasons if they've not already been stated here:
> 1. Should servers accept an UNLOCK request where the Request-URI names
> any resource covered by the lock named in the lock token?
> 2. Or, should servers redirect that UNLOCK request to the root of the
> lock?
> 3. If something else, please explain.
 

No strong preference so just go with what existing servers do. 

J.